A couple of several years in the past, a scandal broke out in the smartphone industry on how when reputable benchmarking tools have turn out to be suddenly unreliable since smartphone brands have been evidently dishonest their way to large numbers. That resulted in substantial variations to individuals tools and even a couple of lawsuits. Other than that, although, it seems that absolutely nothing has definitely improved since when MediaTek was claimed to be undertaking this form of dishonest, it gave the identical response Huawei did two several years in the past: everyone’s undertaking it in any case.
To be reasonable, not absolutely everyone agrees on what really should be benchmarked. Some believe tools really should recreate and report functionality that is as shut to actual-planet usage when other folks, like MediaTek, believe the numbers really should mirror the greatest throughput a mobile phone is able of. To do that, even so, chip and mobile phone makers have to pull out all the stops, proficiently dishonest the benchmark test.
AnandTech identified this when a Helio P95 with two-yr-previous Cortex-A75 cores solidly beat the Dimensity 1000L’s Corex-A77 cores. Extended tale shorter, it realized that MediaTek’s silicon identifies selected benchmarking tools and then permits “sports mode” for greatest functionality, at the expense of battery lifetime, of class. This is quite a great deal the identical circumstance from several years in the past and is precisely a single of MediaTek’s arguments.
MediaTek’s response essentially boils down to how it is an field-large apply in any case and that mobile phone makers can disable this sporting activities mode if they want to. It even would make a reference to a competitor, which can only be Qualcomm, that works by using individuals identical ways.
These statements, if taken at encounter price, reveals that absolutely nothing has definitely improved in the field at any time because individuals benchmarking scandals broke out. MediaTek is also ironically casting doubt on the total procedure, which would signify that any claim it would make about its chips’ functionality would also be held suspect.